The New Generation Of Banging Hardtechno
The New Generation Of Banging Hardtechno
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Galleries
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
The New Generation Of Banging Hardtechno Forum Index
->
Michael Random
Post a reply
Username
Subject
Message body
Emoticons
View more Emoticons
Font colour:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Indigo
Violet
White
Black
Font size:
Tiny
Small
Normal
Large
Huge
Close Tags
Options
HTML is
OFF
BBCode
is
ON
Smilies are
ON
Disable BBCode in this post
Disable Smilies in this post
Confirmation code: *
All times are GMT + 2 Hours
Jump to:
Select a forum
HTA Radio Intensivestation
----------------
HTA Radio /Revolte-fm.de
Other HT Radio
Tracks
----------------
Rulez > Read First
Hardtechno,Schranz Tracks
Techno Tracks
SpeedCore Tracks
Hardcore & Experimental Style Tracks
Minimal,Electro,Progressive,House,Chill,D`N`B Tracks
Vinyl/CD/Net Releases
----------------
New Releases
CD Releases
Net Releases
Labels Info
Web DJ Shops
Top Charts
Conversation,Fun,Humour,News
----------------
International Area
Off Topic
Funny Videos
Introduce yourself
Producing & DJing
----------------
Remix Content
Producing & DJing
Samples and loops
Mixing - Live Sets , live Acts
Top Producers and DJs
Software and Hardware..
Free Upload Sharing - Links
Tips and ....
Parties, Events, Clubs & Locations /Stream
----------------
Parties, Events, Clubs & Locations
Pics From Events
Videos From Events
Best Producers
----------------
Heroes Of Hardtechno
Friends of HTA
----------------
Friends
HTA Producers & DJs /Friends
----------------
Dariush Gee
Michael Random
Hexor
TRIVIAL Bookings [Spain]
Acid Flux
NGoHT /Hungary/
Giveway Records /England/
Albert Kraner
Salva Trucha
Boris Naumann
Benur
Teknicity
SpeeDevon [Speedcore]
DestroyER
sChranzkurwa
Rhytmical Overdose
Bednarz
Ekström
Arkus Vitt
Schranzao aka DJ Schranzer
Instigator
XhÈ
Kill Brothers
KRUDEL Team
DJ Sakit
Topic review
<table border="0" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1" width="100%" class="forumline"> <tr> <th class="thCornerL" width="22%" height="26">Author</th> <th class="thCornerR">Message</th> </tr> <tr> <td width="22%" align="left" valign="top" class="row1"><span class="name"><a name=""></a><b>qa9tsg2s8ku</b></span></td> <td class="row1" height="28" valign="top"><table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr> <td width="100%"><img src="http://picsrv.fora.pl/subSilver/images/icon_minipost.gif" width="12" height="9" alt="Post" title="Post" border="0" /><span class="postdetails">Posted: Fri 9:32, 13 May 2011<span class="gen"> </span> Post subject: Ghostcrawler and the hybrid tax</span></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><hr /></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2"><span class="postbody">Ghostcrawler has put a significant sticky up on the forums about what he calls the buy wow gold "hybrid tax" in terms of PvE play -- there's been some back and forth lately on the forums about hybrid wow gold classes and what they should and shouldn't be able to do, and GC wants to put any confusion about what Blizzard intends "hybrids" to be to rest. Very basically, he says that there are three roles in the game (tanking, healing, and DPS), and if a class can respec to perform a different role, it's considered a hybrid class. Otherwise, it's a "pure" class. This means a few things: pure classes, world of warcraft gold he says, should have slightly higher DPS ("all things being equal," and when does that ever happen?), because they don't have the option to switch out. There's no rule as to how much better that is, but as a tradeoff of rerolling being the only way for "pures" to switch,<a href="http://www.cheapestffxivgil.com" target="_blank" class="postlink">cheapest ffxiv gil</a>, they get to be a little better. That's the "hybrid tax," and mages, hunters, rogues,<a href="http://www.cheapestaionkinah.com" target="_blank" class="postlink">Aion kinah</a>, and warlocks don't have to pay it. <br />Hybrids, however,<a href="http://www.cheapestffxivgil.com" target="_blank" class="postlink">ffxiv gold</a>, do, and that means that paladins, druids, priests, shamans, and to a certain extent, warriors and death knights, will in Blizzard's view never be able to equal "pure" classes in terms of DPS output, with everything else being equal. You may love your ret pally, and he may be in uber gear, but he should never be able to pour out as much damage as an equally specced and geared hunter, because you can switch to healing, and the hunter can't. <br />Is that wrong? Not at all -- it may disappoint some people (and Ghostcrawler probably knows, but we'll remind him anyway that posting even this clearly on the forums won't put a lot of complaints to rest),<a href="http://www.cheapestffxivgil.com" target="_blank" class="postlink">cheap ffxiv gil</a>, and it may cause some rerolls, but it definitely makes sense. Flexibility is an asset, and not having that flexibility in a pure class does mean that they should get out of paying that tax. If you only do one thing, you should be able to do it better than someone who has the option to do all three. And as he says, what you want to do with the class has nothing to do with how Blizzard is balancing them overall. It doesn't matter if all you wanted to do when you rolled that priest was play shadow -- they need to be balanced as hybrids. <br />GC says that Blizzard has played around with roles in the past, but going forward,<a href="http://www.cheapestffxivgil.com" target="_blank" class="postlink">buy ffxiv gil</a>, this is the philosophy: if you're playing a hybrid class, you'll never be able to fulfill a role as well as if you were playing the "pure" class meant to serve that role.</span></td> </tr> </table></td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" height="1" class="spaceRow"><img src="http://picsrv.fora.pl/subSilver/images/spacer.gif" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></td> </tr> </table>
fora.pl
- załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo
Powered by
phpBB
© 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Regulamin
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Galleries
Register
Log in to check your private messages
Log in