The New Generation Of Banging Hardtechno

ov9ymd9517

a shoe factory in Wuhan, said Tianmou absenteeism in 1989, 282 days total, shoe notified in June that year to plant work But she did not come. When the end of shoe factory workers on behalf of the General Assembly convened, at the relevant departments for the record, after public notice by posting it removed. Shoe has been removed from office where the notice of decision Tianmou.

(Reporter intern Jiajin Jie Tang Hui) are units removed 16 years ago, is now only received notice of the infringement of labor rights of workers to the ground, will be a cloth factory in Wuhan court to resume its work relationship. Court of First Instance that the shoe factory workers Tianmou to stop before the work has not yet reached the unit, not to fulfill labor obligations to the unit, the unit has not paid their wages or living expenses, the two sides of labor relations does not exist.
Court after more than 1 hour of debate, the court did not sentence case.
ruling, appeal against women Tianmou, Wuhan City Intermediate People's Court rejected the request Tianmou maintain verdict. Hubei Provincial People's Procuratorate to the wrong court of second instance to lodge a protest, 13, hold a further hearing the case.

1995, the shoe factory was halted and pension and other workers in the register by the shoe factory responsible for the payment of social insurance. Now the shoe is facing reform,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], Tianmou only to the factory asked for financial compensation. Tianmou shoe that does not belong to restructuring object, refused Tianmou requirements.

16 years later found out that they have been removed

the first trial, appeal against Tianmou, Wuhan City Intermediate People's Court of second instance the case, upheld decision. August 2008, the Hubei Provincial People's Procuratorate to the law court for error, that the shoes factory said it had notified Tianmou report back to the factory, but no evidence. In addition, the shoes factory and was not served notice of expulsion Tianmou himself but to the

Reporter learned yesterday, the Wuhan City Intermediate People's Court hearing the case again, Tianmou shoe court to ask for labor rights,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], that the shoe be removed without authorization, and received after 16 years notice of shoe is at fault, to bear some responsibility.

workers sued the unit ask for the right to work
2006, the Hanyang District People's Court hearing of the case. Court that the Department of shoe factory workers Tianmou, but Tianmou not yet reached to the shoe factories stop production until the unit to work, failure to fulfill labor obligations,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], shoe factories have not paid their wages or living expenses, the two sides have virtually no work relationship. Tianmou requires restoration of labor relations shoe does not hold the request, the court dismissed.

Tianmou alleged that in 1980, she was assigned to a shoes factory in Wuhan. As shoe economic downturn, January 1989, cloth factory oral notice her home waiting list, listen to notifications to work.
shoe: absent 282 days has been removed

16 years later, Tianmou arrangement again requires work shoe,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], shoe removal notice allowed to sign out, Tianmou did not know he was being removed in December 1989. Tianmou that the shoe made the removal notice, neither the facts, not in compliance with legal procedures, is invalid, requiring resumption of labor relations with its shoe factories. Meanwhile, Tianmou required for shoe for pension, unemployment, health care and other social insurance.

相关的主题文章：

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]